South Ossetia: New EU’s chance to build defense identity
Since the most recent weekend the security environment on the periphery of Europe has changed. Russian armed forces not only operate in breakaway region of South Ossetia, but in Georgia as well. The explanations of Moscow’s steps vary from act of aggression to example of how hard foreign policy can be made.
If I interpret recent events in Georgia, I would say that Kremlin behaves like classical superpower and its steps are shaped by international relations theory called School of Realism. The situation is more that favorable: Russian “peacekeeping” contingents are present in area as early as 90s, state economy allows President Dmitrij Medvedev and Prime Minister Vladimir Putin to lead military operations like those and since collapse of soviet era Moscow feels stronger than never before.
On the other hand, what will be the reply of EU? Will we be effective in bringing solutions of crisis management and realizing them as well? 90s showed that EU is probably the superpower in matter of providing humanitarian aid, but on the other hand, removing aftermaths of bloody conflicts becomes relevant only if the ceasefire was settled. In 90s neither Brussels nor any member state alone was able to enforce peace in Western Balkans. US a NATO did so.
Europe stands before similar situation now: it must react to conflict on its own periphery. Commissioner Louis Michel promised humanitarian aid worthy of million euro for civilian victims in Georgia, but is it enough? I think this time offers more. It is favor not only for bringing Russian solutions, but European ones as well. It is opportunity for EU to learn how to speak with single voice in matter of hard power and Community’s opportunity to become security actor able to challenge Russia. In other words, it is chance of ours to build own defense identity.


